User blog comment:Centrist16/SOMETHING EVERYONE MUST KNOW/@comment-25641444-20150811170803/@comment-3398633-20150904215645

One, don't go digging up old forum threads. Understood? And two, no everything is not natural. If that were the case we'd be imbracing war and pedophilia as nature aspects of human nature. You can't accept one thing because it supports ou argument and denouce the other because it undermines it. If everything is nature and okay, then you have to accept the good with the bad.

As for the topic of bisexuality, it was not the default. Japan's population never really paid much heed to religious morality throughout its history, while the Greeks and Romans worshipped gods that actively engaged in such behavior. However, this behavior was no global. The majority of the world was not fond of it, and you only saw acceptable of homosexuality in tiny tribes. People like to point to Africa as one example of widespread acceptance, but those instances were confined to small tribes and did not reflect the views of the majority. Likewise, in the Middle East, long before Islam and Christianity came on the scene, homosexuality and bisexuality were not accepted by the population either.

And note, you only see acceptance of same-sex relationships in either backwords tribes (Native Americans and aborigines) or socially repressive cultures (Rome, Greece, and Japan weren't known for their humanitarian views). In more advanced states such as the Persian Empire, India, and more importantly, China, homosexuality was deemed to be morally wrong, and attempts were made to combat it. And note, all of these took place in nations with no Juedo-Christian influences in them, so you can't blame religion for their abhorrence to homosexuality.